On 07/08/2013, at 12:39 AM, Peter Niederwieser <pnied...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to make two proposals on how Java compilation could be improved,
> based on experiences in the field.
> 
> 1. First-class support for compiling with a specific JDK
> 
> Many people want to compile with a specific JDK. Currently the only way to
> achieve this is to set `options.forkOptions.executable`. However, this means
> that Gradle can't use the compiler daemon and has to fall back to the
> command line compiler integration, which forks a new compiler for each
> compile task and is dead slow.
> 
> Therefore I propose to add a `forkOptions.jdkHome` property that points to
> the JDK used to run the compiler daemon. This will significantly speed up
> compilation and will get more people off the command line compiler
> integration.
> 
> 2. Default to empty source path
> 
> Currently, Gradle inherits the javac behavior of defaulting the source path
> to the compile class path. This causes problems as soon as Jars on the
> compile class path contain sources, which isn't uncommon (`guava-gwt` being
> just one example). Most people haven't even heard about source paths and
> can't explain what's going on. While useful in some cases (e.g. Java-Groovy
> joint compilation), source paths seem to be a mostly historic feature.
> 
> Therefore I propose to add an explicit `sourcepath` property that gets
> defaulted to the empty source path. This makes source paths an opt-in rather
> than an opt-out, solving a recurring pain for users.
> 
> Thoughts?

Both seem like good changes to me.

-- 
Luke Daley
Principal Engineer, Gradleware 
http://gradleware.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to