Thanks Adam for your insight. I agree that option #2 would probably be a
really good start. Unfortunately, for someone who is pretty new to the code
base, I would rather start with #1 by exposing n on the compile task, set
it to one by default and have the logic there to fork compiler tag. I would
stress that it's a temporary fix and it will be stream line later with #2
and #3. It would also be much easier for me to contribute #1 in a
reasonable time, say for 2.1, and take more time to implement a full
solution. How does that sound?

If you strongly prefer #2 as a start point, could you point me to a couple
place where changes should be applied so I start looking into it?


On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Adam Murdoch <adam.murd...@gradleware.com>
wrote:

>
> On 30 Jun 2014, at 1:51 am, Daniel Lacasse <daniel.lacass...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have been using the native extension for Gradle inside an actual project
> for a couple months. The biggest limitation I'm seeing is the inflexibility
> of the compile task when compared to other build tool in the industry. The
> --parallel switch works great for concurrent execution of tasks. When it
> comes to the compile task, all files are compiled one after the other. The
> native compiler are quite slow especially when it comes to compiling C++
> templates. As a comparison, my dev box is mostly idle while compiling with
> Gradle as oppose to a fairly important load when compiling Visual Studio.
>
> The main use case of this feature is the speed up of the compilation
> process for the native extension. To highlight how this feature is
> important, I will point out that some company where I previously worked at
> use system like Incredibuild to perform parallel distributed compilation.
> Even with such system, the compilation was still pretty time consuming. In
> it's present form, Gradle is not suitable in term of speed for those
> scenario. I talked to a couple Gradleware engineers during Gradle Summit
> 2014 and some insane features are planed to address this problem.
> Unfortunately, a quicker solution is needed in order to speed up the
> adoption of Gradle as a native build tool. I also want this feature to be
> in accordance to the long term Gradle road map.
>
> I would like to start the discussion for contributing this into Gradle.
>
>
> That would be great.
>
> From my limiting knowledge of Gradle here are a couple open issues I have.
> I hope some brilliant minds from Gradleware can share there wisdom on where
> to move forward with this feature.
>
> Open issues
>  - What is the current road map for such feature.
>
>
> I think there are 3 potential steps we could take:
>
> 1. The compilation tasks do something specific, where they fork n
> concurrent compilations, and n is just some setting on the compilation
> tasks.
>
> 2. Then, we introduce some general service that tasks can use for
> coordinating concurrent work. This would be integrated with
> —parallel-threads. The compilation tasks, the test tasks, and the task
> executor would all use this service to ensure that an appropriate amount of
> concurrent work happens at any given time. This would be a public service
> that any task implementation could use.
>
> 3. Then later, we add more capabilities to this so that the work can
> treated more like tasks - with their own up-to-date checks, dependencies,
> and so on.
>
> We could start with #1 and later extract #2, or we could jump straight to
> #2. In some ways, it might be nice to start with #2.
>
>
>    - This could also be used in any language which require compilation
> such as Java.
>    - Allowing custom implementation of this feature could allow a company
> to plug Gradle in there current Incredibuild infrastructure or any other
> distributed framework.
>  - How this feature fits with the --parallel flag?
>
>
> For every build, there should be two settings that you can tweak:
>
> 1. The maximum amount of parallel work that can be performed by Gradle.
> 2. Whether or not tasks should be executed in parallel.
>
> That is, Gradle will be able to do stuff in parallel even if the tasks
> aren’t executed concurrently. It already does this with test execution.
>
> I would change —parallel-threads to control the maximum work but to not
> enable parallel task execution. It would default to some ‘reasonable’ value
> - the number of cores, say, at least to start with.
>
>
>  - How the number of parallel compilation unit will be configure aka
> number of files that can be compiled in parallel?
>
>
> As above.
>
>  - Should this feature be always on by default or have a toggle flag?
>
>
> Always on, I think. Why would you turn it off?
>
>
> --
> Adam Murdoch
> Gradle Co-founder
> http://www.gradle.org
> CTO Gradleware Inc. - Gradle Training, Support, Consulting
> http://www.gradleware.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
Daniel

Reply via email to