From: Luke Daley [mailto:luke.da...@gradleware.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:08 PM
To: KARR, DAVID; dev@gradle.codehaus.org
Subject: Re: [gradle-dev] Question about phrase in userguide doc




On 4 July 2014 at 7:53:07 am, KARR, DAVID 
(dk0...@att.com<mailto:dk0...@att.com>) wrote:
I'm planning on reading and proofreading the user guide, and submitting the 
changes in a PR. I've found a few typos and wordos in just the first few pages.

This would be an extremely useful contribution.
 Usually, I find it obvious what the person meant, and can suggest a better 
wording. However, sometimes I just can't parse what they were trying to say. I 
found one of those ungrokable statements in the "overview" section, which says:

"Only by that using Groovy is the fun and productivity gain it can be."

I can’t decipher it either.
If I'm reading the history correctly, it looks like Hans wrote this more than 4 
years ago. If Hans isn't around, can someone interpret what he was trying to 
say here?

I concluded that “Adding Groovy results in an enjoyable and productive 
experience.” is a worthwhile replacement for that sentence.

That’s right. A lot of the user guide material is from the early days and is no 
longer accurate or useful. This is just what happens to documentation over 
time; no one’s fault.

This whole overview chapter needs serious rework. It no longer really reflects 
what we hold to be the core values and key messages. I’d be inclined to scrap 
it and start again, but that’s a different piece of work.

Acknowledged.  Unless a better approach is obvious to me, I’ll stick with 
small-scale improvements of what’s there.  I’ll be glad to consult with others 
for larger rework.

In this particular case, I’d just drop the sentence in question. It’s not 
adding any value that I can see.

If you are doing some proofing (thanks again for this!), don’t hesitate to cull 
sentences. I’d much rather have fewer, sharper, sentences.

I’ll keep that in mind.  I’ve seen a few sentences that didn’t provide any 
value, but the most common pattern I’m seeing are strings of short sentences 
that could be rephrased as a single sentence that flows more naturally in real 
speech (just saying it “sotto voce” to yourself is an easy way to see this).

—

Luke Daley
http://www.gradleware.com

Reply via email to