The response seems positive to this, so I'll start a vote thread.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 5:48 AM Andrea Tasca <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 24/08/25 16:00, James Daugherty wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > In the recent weekly meeting, we discussed how we have repackaged GORM > > related projects to be prefixed with 'grails-data-' coordinates, but > > we have not made an effort to continue renaming GORM everywhere else. > > > > This thread is to discuss people's thoughts on removing references to > > GORM completely & only referring to Grails Persistence Libraries as > > "Grails Data" going forward. > > > > My thoughts: > > 1. We renamed it because GORM does not match implementations - not all > > implementations are true ORMs anymore. > > 2. We have a trademark on Grails and do not have one on GORM. This > > would allow us to enforce our brand. > > 3. Go has become significantly more popular and there's a conflicting > > project using 'GORM': https://github.com/go-gorm/gorm This project > > has existed since 2013, and due to previous names being not enforced, > > I don't think it's feasible to change at this point. > > > > I'm personally a +1 to only using Grails Data going forward and > > dropping the GORM name. > > > > -James
