>From what I understand from your documentation, it looks as though you provide ways to directly connect to Neo4j through a spark job. I assume there might be something similar you could do with Gremlin Server. That might be nice. In that way, users could convert any TinkerPop graph to GraphAr format.
I suppose my main question though is whether or not it would be a good idea for TinkerPop to use GraphAr more directly as an input/output format for OLAP use cases? TinkerPop currently prefers use of Gryo, it's own format based on Kryo, but I feel like GraphAr could be a better choice going forward potentially. I'd be interested to hear what GraphAr experts think about this use case. On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 9:20 PM 李雪(有理) <youli...@alibaba-inc.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello, Stephen > Thank you for bringing up this interesting discussion point. As far as I > am aware, there have not been any formal discussions regarding a direct > collaboration between TinkerPop and GraphAr to this date. However, I > believe a collaborative effort in this area could lead to improvements in > how graph data is managed and processed. > Drawing from our experiences with integrating Neo4j and NebulaGraph, we > have gleaned insights that could prove invaluable in this context. > We are keenly interested in delving deeper into this conversation between > TinkerPop and GraphAr. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > 发件人：Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > 发送时间：2024年5月21日(星期二) 21:02 > 收件人：dev<dev@graphar.apache.org> > 主 题：Apache TinkerPop and GraphAr > Hello - I was just wondering if there have been any discussions about how > TinkerPop and GraphAr might work together a bit. TinkerPop's file system > formats have grown a bit dated to some degree and GraphAr seems like it > could be useful there as a replacement to internal formats, particularly > Gryo. Looking forward to hearing thoughts on this topic. Thanks! > Stephen >
