+1 binding
------------------------------------------------------------------
发件人:Xiaokang <[email protected]>
发送时间:2025年10月31日(周五) 19:40
收件人:dev<[email protected]>
主 题:[VOTE] Proposal to Align Graphar Schema YAML with LDBC LEX
Hello, Apache GraphAr(incubating) Community,
We recently held in-depth discussions with the LDBC LEX (LDBC Extended GQL
Schema) team. Based on these conversations, we propose making adjustments
to Graphar’s current Schema YAML format and would like to solicit your
feedback.
LEX, which is part of the GDC (Graph Data Council) Text2GraphQuery project
focused on property graphs, is a proposed strict superset of GQL graph
types and as a proposal to WG3 for possible future standardization. LEX
includes many of the same players as the WG3 international and INCITS U.S.
national standards bodies.
 LEX has expressed strong interest in Graphar’s current approach of using
YAML to represent graph schemas, and we have already engaged in several
productive discussions on this topic.
Given the strong alignment between LEX’s goals for graph storage
standardization and Graphar’s own mission, we believe this presents a
valuable opportunity for collaboration. To better integrate with the LEX
ecosystem, we plan to adapt Graphar’s YAML format to conform as closely as
possible to LEX’s proposed syntax, this may require changes to our current
YAML structure.
We therefore seek your input: Should Graphar evolve its YAML schema based
on the LEX schema?
The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary number
of votes are reached.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
To learn more about apache graphar, please see https://graphar.apache.org/ 
<https://graphar.apache.org/ >

Reply via email to