Hello Fang,

> I am regret to say that there still some problems in texporting the 
> complex charactors. For example,
>    "一二三四,一二"
> the first charactor "一" should be compared to be the same as the sixth 
> charactor"一",but the result is not the same. I debugged for it and I 
> found that the
>      if ( Count() != rPolyPoly.Count() )
>           bIsEqual = 
> sal_False;                  //PolyPolygon::IsEqual() in poly2.cxx
> and
>      if ( GetSize() != rPoly.GetSize() )
>            bIsEqual = sal_False;                //Polygon::IsEqual() in 
> poly.cxx
>  
> always turned bIsEqual to be false and then made the result to be false 
> even the charactor is the same.
> I think it is none of the bussiness of the offset of the aPolyPoly, it 
> is related to the count() which gained from the vcl. 
>  
> The problem appears irregularly, some times are right but some time are 
> wrong and some times the fisrt is not compared to be the same with the 
> sixth and some time the second is not compared to be the same with the 
> seventh.
> I cannot explain this, can you give me any suggestions? And the I want 
> to know whether the occasion will be happening :when a charactor be 
> generated twice and the PolyPolygon.count() of the the two polypolygon 
> will not be the same?

First please make sure that the same font is selected for the whole string.

Also in your code there are implicit conversions from
basegfx::B2DPolygon to tools Polygon. As far as I know these conversions
optimize away duplicate points and remove bezier control points when
they are not needed. Identifying duplicate points is non-trivial since
equality of floating point coordinates is a little tricky. Since
outlines of glyphs get transformed dependent on their position this
could make a difference on whether a point is identified as duplicate
and  gets removed or not. Please compare the polygon and point count
before the conversion.

--
Herbert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to