Just to remind that we have limitations about binary size in Apache svn. So we would better not provide a binary package including all the catalogs.
Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 于2026年1月22日周四 17:04写道： > > Hi, > > This proposal generally makes sense, but I think there are a few areas where > the framing could be tightened to better align with ASF release and > governance expectations. > > The main point of concern is the distinction of released artifacts.. The > proposal currently describes two binary packages and states that the > “extended” package would not be released. From an ASF perspective, anything > produced by official release tooling, named like a release artifact, or > referenced in release documentation risks being interpreted as an release. It > would be cleaner to treat catalogs-contrib as source-built extensions, rather > than as an alternate binary distribution. > > Related to this, the phrase “relaxed requirements” may unintentionally imply > lower quality or weaker accountability. What’s really being proposed is a > change in the scope of CI enforcement, not a reduction in standards. > > In short, the direction looks reasonable, but tightening the language around > releases and CI policy, should help avoid confusion later, especially during > release reviews. > > Thanks, > Justin
