Keeping small backwards compatible enhancements out of bugfix releases
is good as long as there are frequent non-bugfix releases.
As I there are no frequent non-bugfix releases at the moment :(, I have
no objections to back-porting.
BTW: I think we should release 2.5-beta anyway.
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 16.02.2016 um 22:04 schrieb Paul King:
Any objections to Chris' request? The Jira he referred to is a small
backwards compatible enhancement (rather than bug fix). We'd normally
keep this for new releases but it does open up much nicer Spring
integration options, so I am not too worried about back-porting this
one.
Other opinions?
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:02 AM, John Wagenleitner
<john.wagenleit...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jim,
I think the file you might be looking for is:
src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/StringGroovyMethods.java
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pascal Schumacher
<pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi Jim,
not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us a
pull request.
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 16.02.2016 um 10:18 schrieb jim northrop:
Hi Pascal
could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
String.metadata function ?
thx
jim
On 16 February 2016 at 08:12, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
wrote:
I fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 by reverting as
Shils and John suggested in the discussion of
https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253
Am 15.02.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
Hi Cédric,
great news. :)
I think before https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 should
be resolved, by either applying https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253 or
reverting
https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/fae29119a1102393ae5d1645c3fc1e06547b0ad8
If nobody more qualified offers his opinion on how to handle this I
would just revert, so we can release.
Thanks,
Pascal
Am 15.02.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Cédric Champeau:
Hi guys,
As promised, I will try to find some time to perform a release this
week. The last one is months ago already, and even if we had decided to
migrate to a smoother process, nobody managed to made the modifications yet.
As such and if nobody disagrees, I will perform a release this week
using the "old" incubating process.
Please backport every fix you think is worth having on the 2.4.x branch
asap.
Thanks!
