This sounds reasonable to me too. For Groovy 3, since we've not yet really decided any time scale, we might even go with 9 then :-) but we've got time to decide for that one!
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Cédric Champeau <[email protected]> wrote: > I was thinking of this but didn't get to send an email yet. I basically > think we should make Groovy 2.5 JDK 7+ only, and Groovy 3 JDK 8+. > > > > 2016-07-07 13:00 GMT+02:00 Russel Winder <[email protected]>: > >> Is it still required to have 1.6 as a base JDK version for new Groovy >> releases? >> >> Isn't it time to say if you are still on JDK1.6 then stick with the >> Groovy you have? >> >> This could be said for JDK7 of course since it is EOL. >> >> -- >> >> Russel. >> >> ============================================================================= >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >> sip:[email protected] >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
