Hi Jochen, > Could somebody double check the file size? 943.78k... but I find groovy is lack of a high performance LRU cache currently, which is important for Groovy.
> Then of course there is the question why we do not use ConcurrentHashMap > instead.... because? Because ConcurrentHashMap does not supply any function to remove oldest element automatically :) Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Refine-the-implementation-of-LRUCache-tp5736323p5736329.html Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
