Yeah, is is currently the method is(), not an operator. But might be a good addition too.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Sergei Egorov <bsid...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about is and !is ? Would be nice to have them :) > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:53 PM Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > >> >> >> ----- Mail original ----- >> > De: "Graeme Rocher" <graeme.roc...@gmail.com> >> > À: dev@groovy.apache.org >> > Cc: d...@groovy.incubator.apache.org >> > Envoyé: Vendredi 18 Novembre 2016 15:16:04 >> > Objet: Re: Negative relational operators for Groovy 3 >> >> > In agreement with everyone else here. >> > >> > +1 to !in and !instanceof >> > -1 to everything else >> > >> > Cheers >> >> even !! >> >> Rémi >> >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> OK. I see :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 在 Cédric Champeau [via Groovy] <ml-node+[hidden email]>，2016年11月18日 >> >> 下午9:18写道： >> >> >> >> I agree with Jochen and Guillaume: +1 to !instanceof and !in, but I >> don't >> >> like the other variants. >> >> >> >> 2016-11-18 14:11 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sun <[hidden email]>: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Jochen, >> >>> >> >>> > I think !instanceof and !in are ok. The others... not sure here. >> Right >> >>> > now a*=b, which means !< is >=. And in this >> >>> > case I actually prefer >=. >> >>> >> >>> Sometimes we write code like "!(a > b)", now we can write "a !> >> b" >> >>> instead, which is much close to our mind :) >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Daniel.Sun >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> View this message in context: >> >>> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for- >> Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736816.html >> >>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion >> >> below: >> >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Negative-relational-operators-for- >> Groovy-3-tp5736809p5736817.html >> >> To unsubscribe from Negative relational operators for Groovy 3, click >> here. >> >> NAML >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> View this message in context: Re: Negative relational operators for >> Groovy 3 >> >> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Graeme Rocher >> > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
