Yay! It's one of the top items on my wish list :-)
IMHO it helps write cleaner and easier to read code --no ugly
intermediate variables set to `null`. It'd be great if we could have
the same approach for `for`, `while`, `switch`, `do` and `while`.
That being said, I'm curious: would translating it to a closure call
incur performance penalties?
--
Bahman
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been thinking about support some syntax like `def x = if (...)
> { ... } else if (...) { ... } else { ... }`, which will be translated to
> `def x = { if (...) { ... } else if (...) { ... } else { ... } }()`
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
