On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 02:26 +0900, Remko Popma wrote: > Would there be any interest in a next generation CliBuilder that is > based on [picocli][1] instead of commons-cli?
Personally I am all for a new CLI system for Groovy. There are though many different CLI frameworks already out there, many have previously been discussed in various threads on this list. Indeed I think there has been some work, but none that got absorbed into the standard Groovy distribution. So the question for me is not how to replace commons-cli just what to do. So the question for me is what distinguishes picocli from all the other options. > […] -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
