+1
On 2018/04/05 16:13:57, Paul King <p...@asert.com.au> wrote: > Dear development community,> > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1 release!> > > This release includes 18 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the> > changelog:> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12342817> > > > Tag:> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_2_5_0_RC_1> > > Tag commit id: 1c709fc51ffb1b1ab78d8c66dfc4aa2da523c0b9> > > The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r26192).> > Source release:> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/2.5.0-rc-1/sources> > Convenience binaries:> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/2.5.0-rc-1/distribution> > > Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1.> > > Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:> > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval> > Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with> > sha256sum):> > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least> > three +1 PMC votes are cast.> > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1> > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok> > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1 because...> > > Here is my vote:> > > +1 (binding)> >
