Hi, good work :) It seems a nice feature, but I'm wondering why having two different methods doing the same ? asType and getAs.
- I think is always better to avoid having two methods doing the same, specially when asType can be called both directly or via sugar syntax. - I also think the use case fits asType perfectly, as it's mentioned in its Groovydoc entry: "Converts a given object to a type" IMHO I would stick only to asType. Mario El mar., 15 may. 2018 a las 9:36, Daniel.Sun (<sun...@apache.org>) escribió: > I think it is nice for me :-) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >
