What about 2.97 ? Incorporates a JDK 7 reference, and is not too close to 3.0 (Bugfixes could go into 2.97.1 etc..., so the "7" could be kept). -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> Datum: 20.05.18 12:26 (GMT+01:00) An: pa...@asert.com.au, dev@groovy.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Renumber Groovy 2.6 to 2.9 On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 13:58 +1000, Paul King wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what people thought about renumbering Groovy 2.6 to 2.9. > It is only a subtle change but I think better conveys that it isn't a small > step up > from 2.5 but rather something just a bit short of 3. >
If it is to be the last 2.X release why not 2.99 to make it more "in your face"? -- Russel. ========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
