I just propose the smarter type inference for methods, which was in my TODO list.
> We explicitly chose not to be too smart here, because it can be confusing > to users. OK. Recently I am developing a project based on Groovy. Writing code with "dynamic" mind and compile code in "static" way. So I don't care why STC passes but just care why STC doesn't work and try to fix compilation errors, some of which impress me that Groovy is not smart enough. So I don't understand why smarter type inference will confuse users. Cheers, Daniel.Sun Cheers, Daniel.Sun ----- Daniel Sun Apache Groovy committer Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
