I just propose the smarter type inference for methods, which was in my TODO
list.

> We explicitly chose not to be too smart here, because it can be confusing
> to users.

OK. Recently I am developing a project based on Groovy.  Writing code with
"dynamic" mind and compile code in "static" way. So I don't care why STC
passes but just care why STC doesn't work and try to fix compilation errors,
some of which impress me that Groovy is not smart enough.
So I don't understand why smarter type inference will confuse users.

Cheers,
Daniel.Sun


Cheers,
Daniel.Sun




-----
Daniel Sun 
Apache Groovy committer 
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me 
Twitter: @daniel_sun 

--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Reply via email to