+1 on this, definitely a good idea, will greatly help with the same
topic being be raised and discussed on the ML, Stackoverflow, in blogs,
etc time and time again, with most of the discussion (and hopefully at
least some conclusion) being lost in time in the end.
Just must make an effort that newcomers to Groovy are aware that this
exists...
On 11.10.2018 10:21, Paul King wrote:
One of the things which I don't believe we ever brought across from
the codehaus move was the GEP part of the codehaus wiki:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150504145954/http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GroovyJSR/Groovy+Enhancement+Proposal
We certainly have merged the outcomes from the GEPs into the language
as needed and parts of the doco and some tests capture bits of the GEP
design and outcomes as does some of the issues in Jira but not the
original GEPs.
I was going to try to bring those across and convert to asciidoc on
the way - for historical purposes but also to be in a better position
to cater for new ones. We have made do with using Jira but I'm not
sure that is the best way to capture this kind of information.
I was thinking under groovy-website rather than the core repo. Thoughts?
Cheers, Paul.
