I am not against a shortened form but I'd wait and see how usage of @Groovydoc goes first. If it's use is extremely popular it would make sense to consider shortcuts.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 4:22 AM Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I find that a bit too cryptic. > I prefer it to be more explicit, even if a bit more verbose. > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:28 PM Daniel.Sun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Current switch for runtime groovydoc is a bit verbose, i.e. >> `@Groovydoc` is a bit long. For example, >> ``` >> /** >> * @Groovydoc >> * some groovydoc here >> * >> * >> >> ``` >> >> I propose a new switch as follows(a `@` appended to `/**`): >> >> /**@ >> * >> * some groovydoc here >> * >> * >> >> ``` >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Daniel Sun >> Apache Groovy committer >> Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me >> Twitter: @daniel_sun >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >> > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Twitter: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> >
