Hi Daniel,
I totally understand that you want to move this along, however I have
just added a comment, suggesting an alternative, more concise syntax,
which I believe would be worth considering:
Closure<R1|X:R2|Y,Z:R3>
Cheers,
mg
On 16/02/2019 16:46, Daniel.Sun wrote:
Dear development community,
I completed the GEP for polishing the generics type syntax for closure[1]
just now and happy to start the VOTE thread. The GEP is targeted for Groovy
3.0.0.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
three +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Polish the generics type syntax for closure
[ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
[ ] -1 Do not polish the generics type syntax for closure because...
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8992
-----
Apache Groovy committer
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
