+1 (binding)

Sent from my primitive tricorder

> On 14 Feb 2020, at 11:07, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Dear development community,
> 
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.1 release!
> There was a glitch in the Groovy binaries in the 3.0.0 release so
> I thought it prudent to get this out sooner rather than later.
> 
> This release includes 10 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12346968
> 
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_1
> Tag commit id: 2b7163965105421072d495bde918c236fdd8fb7a
> 
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r38042).
> Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.1/sources
> Convenience binaries: 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.1/distribution
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.1.
> 
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
> 
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 
> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.1
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.1 because...
> 
> Here is my vote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 

Reply via email to