That option is not available when using, for example, java.util.function.Function.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, 03:34 Angelo Schneider <angelo.schnei...@oomentor.de> wrote: > Is that not already covered by the call() - method? > I mean the option to declare a method called `Object call(args)ยด > Best Regards > Angelo > > --- > Angelo Schneider > angelo.schnei...@oomentor.de > +49 172 9873893 > > > Am 29.04.2021 um 02:47 schrieb Christopher Smith < > chrylis+gro...@gmail.com>: > > > > It would be convenient to be able to use the convention of "use > > parentheses on a function-like object" with functional interfaces; for > > example, if a variable is declared as type Function, to have > > `myVar(3)` run `myVar.apply(3)`. Is there any chance this would be > > practical, or would its semantics be limited sufficiently by the > > default-dynamic nature of Groovy to not add value? > > > > (I have in mind Groovy's tendency to do runtime switcheroos with > > anything that implements Map as a counterexample, but that may be > > beside the point.) > >
