Definately something we should look at. A few folks we'd need to work with to make that happen. My thinking is let's get Geb over the line first and then we can repeat for a few other projects if/as needed.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024, 6:57 PM Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> wrote: > It'd be nice (beyond the existing bundling) to further include it as a > dedicated module. > Also updated to more modern Java idioms, I guess. > And maybe it could be the occasion to evolve Groovy to add some constructs > like async / await like in other languages, but that could be backed by > GPars. > > Guillaume > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:42 AM Balachandran Sivakumar < > balachand...@balachandran.org> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Just like we are voting to bring in Geb under the Apache Groovy >> umbrella, can we also do something about GPars[1]? It's a useful project >> that was run by late Dr. Russel, a Groovy committer IIRC. Thanks >> >> [1] https://gpars.org/ >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Balachandran Sivakumar >> >> >> > > -- > *Guillaume Laforge* > Apache Groovy committer > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud <https://cloud.google.com/> > > - Blog: glaforge.dev > - Twitter: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> > - Mastodon: @glafo...@uwyn.net <http://%40glafo...@uwyn.net/> > >
