+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 1:37 PM Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On 05.11.24 03:22, Paul King wrote: > > Dear development community, > > > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.23 release! > > > > This release includes 6 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12354891 > > > > Tag: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_23 > > Tag commit id: 105c522a4a816838241beb2d5938507e307073f4 > > > > The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r72789). > > Source release: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.23/sources > > Convenience binaries: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.23/distribution > > > > Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.23. > > > > Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > > Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with > sha256sum): > > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.23 > > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.23 because... > > > > Here is my vote: > > > > +1 paulk (binding) > > > > < > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > Virus-free.www.avast.com > > < > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > >
