You got it, Paul. GROOVY-11719 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11719> raised. Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 4:35 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > Hi Jonny, > > Can you create a Jira ticket please? I don't plan to re-roll the release > at this stage and we can fix it in the next release, but I'll await any > further comments from Daniel/Eric who seem to be involved in earlier > commits. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:08 AM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've traced the issue back to 33064484cc043bfb7c2ad75ee8fccbcbc6329b76. I >> think I've hit upon a fix <https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2270>, >> pending review. Apologies for doing this on the release thread. Feel free >> to tell me that I'm out of order or just need to wait for the next release >> train. 😅 >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Trying out the latest snapshot for 4.0.28, I'm encountering an error >>> locally in my company's app's test suite. Based on the origin of the tests, >>> this seems to be a regression of GROOVY-9526 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9526>, or at least in >>> that vicinity. >>> >>> I've created a test (similar to the one we had in our app), which >>> demonstrates the problem. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/compare/GROOVY_4_0_X...jonnybot0:groovy:GROOVY-9526-regression-semantic-analysis-exception?expand=1 >>> >>> This was not failing as recently as a week or two ago, so I suspect it's >>> a relatively recent change. >>> >>> I'm open to being told that the semantics I'm using in this test are >>> truly just invalid and unsupported, but I'll need some clearer idea >>> *why* they are, as we may need to pass some guidance on to our users. >>> >>> Trying to raise this before release in case it's an easy fix. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 1:24 PM Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev < >>> dev@groovy.apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> >>>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2025 5:45 AM >>>> *To:* Groovy_Developers <dev@groovy.apache.org> >>>> *Subject:* [EXT] [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 (Take 2) >>>> >>>> *External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments. >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear development community, >>>> >>>> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 4.0.28 release! >>>> >>>> This release includes 19 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the >>>> changelog: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971 >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFXtjuJpCA$> >>>> >>>> Tag: >>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_4_0_28 >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs*tags*GROOVY_4_0_28__;Ly8!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7LMEnig$> >>>> Tag commit id: bc6204944686858db9c6f195909f2258ad1d2a62 >>>> >>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r78267). >>>> Source release: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFWv2nPY5Q$> >>>> Convenience binaries: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUl-otI_w$> >>>> >>>> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7lBIg0Q$> >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 4.0.28. >>>> >>>> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: >>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html*release-approval__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUegGEwiw$> >>>> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with >>>> sha256sum): >>>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUZ9EcRCw$> >>>> >>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 >>>> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 because... >>>> >>>> Here is my vote: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>>
