Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-27578
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 5:50 PM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was busy again, so apologies for the slightly longer than normal vote > window. > This vote has passed with THREE +1 PMC votes, TWO additional +1 votes, > and no other votes. > I'll chat with admin about closing and/or archiving that list. > > Cheers, Paul. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 8:42 PM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I promised a VOTE thread but got busy. Here is the VOTE thread as > > promised to the following DISCUSS thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/27gz3m7xdpslo54q0tf6gdvdm2n3z198 > > > > Details: > > > > When we created the Geb subproject, I went ahead and created what I > > thought were the normal mailing lists including geb-users and geb-dev. > > I have since refreshed my memory on what is recommended for > > subprojects and having a separate geb-dev list is not recommended > > within the ASF. Formal votes need to happen anyway on the Groovy dev > > (or in rare cases private) list, and in the past some projects with > > such lists suffered from fragmentation. The geb-dev traffic has been > > super low, so I was going to ask infra to delete or archive it > > (whatever they would normally do in such cases). I suggest we keep the > > geb-users list for now. > > > > The folks most involved in Geb have already suggested that geb-dev > > isn't really needed. Instead of using the geb-dev list, we'd just use > > the dev list and use a prefix such as [Geb] if the context isn't super > > obvious. > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Remove the list > > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > > [ ] -1 Keep the list, because... > > > > Here is my vote: +1 > > > > Cheers, Paul.
