Minor correction to the StringGroovyMethods line, that is stripIndent
not eachMatch.

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 9:25 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I asked AI for a summary of the oldest "Incubating" features. The two
> oldest involved Realm and MetaClassConstant. They were the features
> that motivated Jochen to create @Incubating in the first place! I
> don't think we progressed that work but maybe with AI we can consider
> it now. But that would be a Groovy 7 thing.
>
> The next 8 rows are shown below:
>
> 1. 2017-03-28 - Macro methods: @Macro, MacroBuilder, MacroContext,
> MacroClass - Groovy 2.5.0 (@since 2.5.0)
> 2. 2018-02-16 - groovy.transform.options.PropertyHandler: pluggable
> handlers for @Immutable / property AST transforms (GROOVY-8477) -
> Groovy 2.5.0 (@since 2.5.0)
> 3. 2020-01-19 - JavaShell: in-memory Java compiler used by the Groovy
> Console's Java source mode - Groovy 3.0.x
> 4. 2020-01-23 - StringGroovyMethods.eachMatch: new @Incubating
> overload - Groovy 3.0.x
> 5. 2020-08-06 - groovy-contracts: @Requires, @Ensures, @Invariant - Groovy 
> 4.0.0
> 6. 2020-08-19 - groovy-typecheckers: RegexChecker (later joined by
> NullChecker, FormatStringChecker, PurityChecker, ModifiesChecker) -
> Groovy 4.0.0
> 7. 2020-11-06 - GINQ: GinqGroovyMethods - Groovy 4.0.0 (@since 4.0.0)
> 8. 2021-05-04 - groovy-toml: TomlBuilder, TomlSlurper,
> TomlRuntimeException - Groovy 4.0.0 (@since 4.0.0)
>
> I am going to pick off some of those and see if we can stabilise. If
> anyone wants to help, please shout!
>
> I think a good set of criteria for removing incubating status would
> be: seems to be used, design seems stable, not a source of many bug
> issues in Jira, and doesn't seem to suffer from being under-specified.
> I am trying to create GEPs for major things we think need clearer
> specs, but that can proceed in parallel as we have time.
>
> There is no rush to remove the incubating status. No users have
> reported holding back from using particular features because they are
> still incubating. However, since we are adding more new features in 6,
> the length of "still incubating" list is growing longer, so it would
> be nice to prune off a few.
>
> Cheers, Paul.

Reply via email to