Hi,

I think I have to agree with Eric. -1

Normally I would suggest to undo the trait changes in 5.0.7 and go with that, but that would not help Grails either.

Is it a 5.1.0? Well the question is what comes after? If we "fix" the reamining bug, does that lead to a reevaluation of who traits work and then we get a 5.2 next? Also Anchored is a best effort to solve a problem onlly 5.0.x introduced. Do we intend to keep that around? Is Grails using that?

I really do not want to block things, but I the situation does currently not feel exactly right.

I have a wish to Grails here. Could you write a test suite that covers the Grails cases in "all" aspects? And I mean the way you expect the things to work - in pure Groovy, without Grails of course. I think that is better than this case-by-case and late discoveries process we currently have.

bye Jochen


On 6/25/26 20:06, James Daugherty via dev wrote:
Hi Eric,

Would you be agreeable to a release of 5.1.0 or a milestone of 5.1.0
with these changes?  Is your concern for any 5.x version or just the
5.0.x version?

Regards,
James

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 2:02 PM James Fredley <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Eric,

I wanted to share some context on our current work to bring Groovy 5 support 
into Apache Grails 8.

After the Groovy 5 release last year, Grails encountered several compatibility 
challenges. The team has invested substantial effort, more than 75 iterations, 
on this pull request to resolve the issues and enable Grails 8 to ship on the 
stable Groovy 5.0.7 release alongside Spring Boot 4:
https://github.com/apache/grails-core/pull/15557

Without completing this work, we would likely need to release Apache Grails 8 
on Apache Groovy 4 and then target Apache Groovy 6 for Apache Grails 9. 
However, Grails 7 is built on Spring Boot 3.5.x, which reaches end of life on 
June 30, 2026. This creates real pressure to deliver Grails 8 in a timely 
manner.

For clarity, Apache Grails 9 will almost certainly target Apache Groovy 6 
regardless.

On a more positive note, we have also improved our release validation process 
with Canary builds. The previous joint validation approach primarily caught 
issues in patch releases. The new process lets us test Grails against upcoming 
Groovy versions much earlier and more comprehensively:
https://github.com/apache/grails-core/pull/15558

Thank you for your ongoing collaboration. I am happy to discuss timelines, the 
remaining workarounds in the PR, or anything else that would help us coordinate 
effectively.

Best regards,
James Fredley
VP, Apache Grails PMC

This version stays professional, collaborative, and timeline focused while 
remaining fully compliant with your no em dashes preference. Ready to copy and 
send or post to the list.

On 2026/06/25 15:44:42 "Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev" wrote:
-1 (binding)

I do not think the trait static method change (GROOVY-11985) or the new 
Anchored transform (GROOVY-12093) should have been done in a point-fix release. 
 GROOVY-12106 is evidence that one problem has been traded for another.  There 
was quite a bit of discussion, but IMO the behavior should have remained as-is 
and Grails could investigate a workaround.  Groovy 5 was in pre-release state 
for an extended time.  So, there was plenty of time to try it out and discuss 
the trait changes.

Having Groovy 5.0.0 to 5.0.6 have one set of behaviors and then 5.0.7 onwards 
do something else plus have GROOVY-12106 and possibly other issues is not a 
good look.

If 11985 and 12093 were removed, I'm okay with the rest of 5.0.7.  We could 
then further weigh the possibilities for Groovy 5 and 6 WRT trait static member 
references.


________________________________
From: Paul King <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2026 2:46 AM
To: Groovy_Developers <[email protected]>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 5.0.7

Dear development community, I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 5. 0. 
7 release! This release includes 14 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the 
changelog: https: //urldefense. com/v3/__https: //issues. apache. 
org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote. 
jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12356953__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyRDpx1WUg$


Dear development community,

I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 5.0.7 release!

This release includes 14 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12356953__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyRDpx1WUg$

Tag: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs*tags*GROOVY_5_0_7__;Ly8!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyRmvXQoww$
Tag commit id: 061e5462ecd50521e881005a82f2733e31ca976a

The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r85451).
Source release: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/5.0.7/sources__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyQSz2JVOg$
Convenience binaries:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/5.0.7/distribution__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyQpsp9rgw$

Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjySCMw7zpA$

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 5.0.7.

Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html*release-approval__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyRvf488sA$
Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!aTE-LsRa0qOkuOe9PDf8SxURjg4lPNkURZZDxdnHHE1SarHQqnSUqpw4F1byG6kxErokFTjgNp2kjyS1WVRpgA$

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 5.0.7
[ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
[ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 5.0.7 because...

Here is my vote:

+1 (binding)



Reply via email to