Le 28/04/15 07:16, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:51 +0200, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> […] >>> I don't have any of those answers, all that I can say is that managing a >>> large community is always a pain, you can't please every one, but at >>> least, it *is* a community ! And when it comes to provide a decent >>> degree of protection and tooling for such a community, Apahce is not the >>> worst place to be ;-) >> […] >> >> One does not manage a community (*). One can enable and empower a >> community, but it is not controllable (in a centrally-managed economy sort >> of way). >> >> (*) Especially one as large and dispersed as the Groovy community, most of >> whom are not actually known to the central committee. > I would agree with your point here. Me too. See below.
> ASF is very libertarian in a way that it > delegates pretty much every aspect of governing a community to the > PMC. What's left is a few non-negotiable principles that are common > among all the PMC and are collectively known as the "Apache Way". > I would encourage everybody to read: http://theapacheway.com/ 'Gouverning' is the correct word here. 'Managing' is, well, a bit to tainted. Sorry for not being a native english speaker...
