Am 01.05.2015 11:29, schrieb Cédric Champeau:
I agree that we would have probably released 2.4.4 already if we didn't
have to adapt the release process. There are a few steps that need to be
done:
- update NOTICE.txt to include the licenses of the libraries we embed
- adapt the release process to have a staging phase. We need to work
with the JFrog guys for this
we can do a release by hand if we absolutely want to.
There's also the unanswered question of the groupId/artifactId. So far
we use org.codehaus.groovy, and it's so widely used that I am worried if
we change it to org.apache.groovy. There are lots of libraries that draw
org.codehaus.groovy, so if we change it there will undoubtedly be a lot
of dependency conflicts to resolve, which for our users will be a PITA.
For 2.4 such a change is out of scope, even if that means that those
releases are "inofficial"
[...]
The same is true for the version number which has to contain
-incubating. This is still unanswered. Until we have the answers to
those questions, I would not release.
I don't see why the first release has to be perfect right away
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
