Wouldn't applying the license plugin solve the problem of missing/wrong headers?
Sent from my primitive Tricorder > On 08/06/2015, at 5:17, Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8/06/2015 8:56 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> 3. The wording around licensing on >> buildSrc/src/main/java/JavadocFixTool.java >> makes me worried. Has the licensing implications of this >> file every been discussed? > > We run this class on JavaDoc we produce to avoid security vulnerability > CVE-2013-1571. We don't further distribute the class, i.e. it never becomes > part of the built artifacts. In any case, it looks like other Apache > projects step around the issue with a parallel-engineered Ant macro: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-171 > > Cheers, Paul. > > >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Cédric Champeau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Dear community, >>> >>> I am happy to start the first VOTE thread for a Groovy release under the >>> Apache Incubator umbrella! >>> This release both includes a lot of bugfixes, but also required some >>> adjustments for the sake of conforming to the Apache Software Foundation and >>> Apache Incubator guidelines. A big thank to all who contributed and helped >>> us! >>> >>> The changelog for this release can be found here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12331941 >>> >>> Tag for the release: >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-groovy.git;a=tag;h=19f70958f39f0cc5c6b4d3e9471fd297400647d2 >>> >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~cchampeau/groovy/ >>> >>> Release artifacts are signed with the following keys: >>> http://people.apache.org/~cchampeau/groovy/KEYS >>> >>> It is expected that voters check at least checksums and signatures, and of >>> course much better if you can also verify the source package. >>> >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating. >>> >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least >>> three +1 PPMC votes are cast. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating >>> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating because... >>> >>> Here is my vote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus >
