I think my vote (-1) is non binding ;-) And again, the only reason I voted as such is because I couldn't get a clean binary distribution from the source package by following the instructions to the letter. RAT complained about a missing header on a build related file. I know is silly but it needs fixing. Other than that the binaries look good to me!
Cheers, Andres ------------------------------------------- Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast http://jroller.com/aalmiray http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray -- What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Cédric Champeau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all! > > Vote for the release of Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating has passed with 7 > +1 votes (6 binding) and 1 (one) -1 binding vote. We will now ask the IPMC > to vote on the release. > > +1 votes: > > IPMC: > Emmanuel Lécharny > > PPMC: > Cédric Champeau > Guillaume Laforge > Pascal Schumacher > Paul King > Jochen Theodorou > > Non binding: > Steve Amerige > > 0 votes > > (none) > > -1 votes > Andrés Almiray > > Vote thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-groovy-dev/201507.mbox/%3CCADQzvm%3DzDNCxpOua3LQ1ZNo62Aq40QZM7SJwgER5MfkArWrTeA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >
