Indeed, I'll change that. I'll point to the github code site for now.
It has a link to the github.io project information page but not vice
versa at the moment.
Thanks, Paul.
On 19/07/2015 6:52 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
Hi Paul,
as we are using JLine2 shouldn't the Jline part be changed to this:
This product includes/uses Jline2 (http://jline.github.io/jline2)
Distributed under the BSD license
Copyright (c) 2002-2012, the original author or authors.
source: https://github.com/jline/jline2/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
?
-Pascal
p.s.: Thanks for all your hard work on the license/notice files.
Am 19.07.2015 um 04:08 schrieb Paul King:
Just one question I had wrt "BUNDLING PERMISSIVELY-LICENSED DEPENDENCIES".
(from http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps)
It states: "Under normal circumstances, there is no need to modify NOTICE."
Currently I have things like this in some of the NOTICE files:
This product includes/uses the git.io/normalize.css stylesheet
which is distributed under the MIT license
Copyright (c) Nicolas Gallagher and Jonathan Neal
This product includes/uses Jline (http://jline.sourceforge.net)
Distributed under the BSD license
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[email protected]>
And I have the appropriate license text embedded in the LICENSE.
(No short form is currently possible since we don't have the whole
of those projects embedded as dependencies just single source files).
Should I delete those entries from NOTICE since they are permissive
licenses? What are the circumstances which aren't considered "normal"
in terms of the howto wording?
Thanks, Paul.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:21:26 +1000
From: Paul King <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
On 14/07/2015 7:00 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
We don't bundle the source from any of those libraries true, but we do generate
sources as part of our build using ANTLR and we do bundle the class files from
the ANLTR and ASM projects in some of our jars and we do bundle the jars from
some of those projects in some of our binary zips. So, only use of source files
is important for NOTICE/LICENSE or would we need slightly different versions of
those files in different places?
Yes only refer to what is bundled [1] and yes the NOTICE/LICENSE files would
need to be different [2].
We ended up needing ten different NOTICE (and respectively LICENSE) variants
but we should be good now for another release. We might try to get someone to
do a pre-check on a snapshot before we attempt a formal release.
Cheers, Paul.
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
