Hello everybody,
thanks for the feedback. :)
I just closed the issue as "Won't fix".
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 19.07.2015 um 11:06 schrieb [email protected]:
On 2015-07-19 14:33, [email protected] wrote:
On 2015-07-19 13:50, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
Imho we should close it as "won't fix", because it's a breaking change
and the current behavior makes more sense.
+1, we should return 0 if it is a zero byte file(i.e. in bash terms,
test -s <path> should return 0). If the file itself doesn't exist the
Should have been test -s <path> should return 1. :) Thanks
