@Paul: true, but we were really talking about the "performance" module that I added recently, and which contains tests that compare various Groovy runtimes.
2015-10-08 4:51 GMT+02:00 Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au>: > Just as an additional point of clarification, the benchmark folder, > while in our repo and something we have there to catch performance > regressions, isn't part of our official Apache source distributions > yet. Otherwise we would have caught this earlier. One of the issues is > that it contains a bunch of micro-benchmark contributions which have > been collected from numerous sources with unclear licensing in some > cases. The other is that running this suite of benchmarks on anything > but a dedicated and lightly-loaded machine will give spurious results > over time (i.e. not suitable for most CI servers). > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Cédric Champeau > <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good catch. It wasn't intentional, I fixed it. > > > > 2015-10-06 20:06 GMT+02:00 Balachandran Sivakumar > > <balachand...@balachandran.org>: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> When I run gradle build under the subprojects/performance > folder, > >> it is failing at the "rat" task saying unapproved/unknown licenses. It > >> throws the error for the build.gradle file. If I add the standard apache > >> license header to the file the error goes off. Is this something > intentional > >> for test purposes or should I send a PR with the license added ? Thanks > > > > >
