I added the gradle license report plugin to our build. I suspect that covers off LC20 and LC30.
To generate the report, run: $ gradlew generateLicenseReport The default is for the runtime configuration which is what LC20 and LC30 are applicable to I believe. It isn't particularly pretty, doesn't collapse duplicates (12 in our case) and doesn't currently indicate which of our dependencies are optional but it does show that all the mandatory and optional runtime dependencies are covered by ASL2 or BSD. Notes: Ignoring the duplicates there are about a dozen dependencies (10 of those are optional dependencies) Multiverse is an optional dependency of an optional dependency and has no license info in it's pom but is ASL2 as per https://github.com/pveentjer/Multiverse. Openbeans (used within the optional Drooid component) also has no pom and so is excluded from the report but is ASL2. Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, it is ok on the source, even though we could have used the > groovy-website wiki section. > > 2015-10-15 21:14 GMT+02:00 Keegan Witt <keeganw...@gmail.com>: >> >> Would Apache's Confluence instance be a more appropriate place for these >> kinds of things? >> >> -Keegan >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Cédric Champeau >> <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The only problem is that each change triggers a CI build ;) >>> >>> 2015-10-15 20:59 GMT+02:00 Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:52PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >>>> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Cédric Champeau >>>> > <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > > ...I like the idea of having concrete, non >>>> > > subjective criteria for graduating, even if it could mean in our >>>> > > case that >>>> > > graduating would be "stricter".... >>>> > >>>> > We're down to 4 TODOs already, and all of them look quite easy to fix. >>>> >>>> Looks like 3, actually, and the rest seems to be in order! Last time we >>>> did >>>> it on the project website, but having this in the source code is even >>>> better, >>>> IMO! Thanks a lot for taking a lead on this! >>>> >>>> Cos >>>> >>> >> >
