Not sure if anyone else cares, but I would still like to propose the changes to the power assert (more verbose type information). See http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Should-PowerAsserts-be-more-verbose-td5727255.html
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Cédric Champeau <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this should be 3.0. > > 2015-11-01 11:37 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]>: >> >> Sounds worth a 2.5 with all this. >> >> What do you think of the Java 8 related syntax elements? >> More for 2.6, or even 3.0? >> (but we need to decide which ones we want to address and how anyway) >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Cédric Champeau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> At least, releasing a first beta shouldn't be too hard. There are >>> basically 3 things I'd like to see in 2.5: >>> >>> - the new macro stuff, including the AST matcher, which is still WIP, but >>> ready to test >>> - a new sandoxing based on what I described in a blog post [1]. This is >>> not implemented. >>> - the global flag on @ASTTest to enable it only in tests. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Cédric >>> >>> [1] http://melix.github.io/blog/2015/03/sandboxing.html >>> >>> 2015-11-01 11:23 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Hi Pascal, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Pascal Schumacher >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>> >>>>> when do we plan to release Groovy 2.5? >>>> >>>> >>>> That's a good question, but I think we should decide first what we want >>>> to put in this release :-) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Guillaume Laforge >>>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >>>> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet >>>> >>>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >>>> Social: @glaforge / Google+ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Guillaume Laforge >> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet >> >> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >> Social: @glaforge / Google+ > >
