Hi Yvan, Dne Saturday 12 May 2007 20:57 Yvan BARTHÉLEMY napsal(a):
> > As I already wrote you ;-) > > (http://gsl.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=1901), in > > the long run, the agreement is that it would be best to UNOize the print > > dialog, similarly to how the file dialog works. Maybe you could try to > > do a proof-of-concept implementation using Caolan's work? > > I don't really understand whether I should do a proof-of-concept of > Caolan's work using UNO, or a proof-of-concept of Aqua printing dialog > inspired by Caolan's work. > > However, I don't understand the benefits provided using UNO rather > using the coding template used by Sal (i.e. system-dependant > subclasses) VCL is very low-level in OOo, and it has to be low-level, because of it's nature - it handles all the drawing, etc. Providing all the framework just for creating some high-level dialog does not make any sense [we already have too much code duplication in OOo now], it's better to use the existing UNO framework to do that. Think of the unx case where we do have to decide which dialog to use (Gtk+ or KDE) in runtime. Regards, Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
