> > If this hyprint uses a static channel, why not use Guacamole's existing > > support for static channels? > > I have used Guacamole's existing support for static channels?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Mike Jumper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Amarjeet Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > ... > > > > I want to remove the dependency here as our hyprint static channel saves > > the file in the Shared drive and If I pass the below URL and download is > > disabled using the above flag. It calls the get handler where I have > > disabled the downloads. > > > > If this hyprint uses a static channel, why not use Guacamole's existing > support for static channels? > > If you're set on having an application running within the remote desktop > that deals with the printing on that side, why not pass that printout using > the normal RDPDR print mechanisms? > > It sounds like the issue here is not that you need to change the Guacamole > protocol (which, again, is something you should only consider with extreme > skepticism), but that you need to work out a usable transport that does not > rely on a hack powered by drive redirection and Guacamole's special > "Download" folder. > > - Mike >
