mike-jumper commented on a change in pull request #238: GUACAMOLE-625: Included 
Latin American keymap
URL: https://github.com/apache/guacamole-server/pull/238#discussion_r329336072
 
 

 ##########
 File path: src/protocols/rdp/Makefile.am
 ##########
 @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ rdp_keymaps =                   \
     $(srcdir)/keymaps/en_gb_qwerty.keymap \
     $(srcdir)/keymaps/en_us_qwerty.keymap \
     $(srcdir)/keymaps/es_es_qwerty.keymap \
+    $(srcdir)/keymaps/latam_qwerty.keymap \
 
 Review comment:
   I agree that we should prefer to remain consistent with the existing 
convention (`[language code]-[country code]-[variant]`) or, if that isn't 
working any longer in practice, investigate whether we should be using a 
different convention.
   
   Following current convention, if "latam" is the proper identifier for all 
countries associated with this keyboard layout, it sounds like the layout 
identifier that follows our convention would be `es-latam-qwerty`.
   
   **BUT**, from the [forum thread linked 
above](https://askubuntu.com/questions/8797/what-is-the-two-character-language-code-for-the-latin-american-keyboard-layout),
 we may want to look into a better system:
   
   > ... That aside, I would recommend against using language codes to indicate 
keyboard layouts. There is a separate system already in place for abbreviating 
the names of the layouts themselves. See `shortDescription` in 
[xkb-data](http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/xkb-data)'s `base.xml`.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to