Mike, et al,
I've not commented on the branching scheme as I see it much more in your
purvey than mine, and it seems pretty much everyone is happy with the
proposal (apart, for a brief moment fortunately, Nick :)
However the second part of your discussion document was the Roadmap.
Given the queries I see from time to time, and more direct experience
here, I have two questions on the proposed Roadmap:
(1) Where does the multi-monitor support fit (GUACAMOLE-288)?
(2) Where does http(s) protocol support fit (at one point this was a
definite 'no', however I believe this view has changed somewhat?).
Just making an initial enquiry first. Completely realise the other work
noted will be huge, and I'm not sure if this warrants further discussion
at this point, however I do consider these two items to be important...
Regards all, Luke.
On 26/02/24 05:55, Michael Jumper wrote:
Alrighty - with no objections, I'll move forward with creating/renaming
branches as necessary and documenting the new branching scheme. This
_should_ make things much more friendly and flexible.
- Mike
