Can you send your full docker-compose.yml (redacted as necessary)?

The only issue I see with what you've shown below is that the copy of guacamole-server is being taken directly from the "staging/1.6.0" branch and thus will not have the pending changes from previously mentioned PR:

https://github.com/apache/guacamole-server/pull/573

- Mike

On 2/15/25 1:04 AM, Tobias Feller | OPC wrote:
Hi Mike,

i have testet the staging/1.6.0 (docker), but have some problems to bring it up.

What i have done...

git clone --single-branch --branch staging/1.6.0 https://github.com/ apache/guacamole-server.git git clone --single-branch --branch staging/1.6.0 https://github.com/ apache/guacamole-client.git

Customize my working docker-compose.yml file from image:

#image: guacamole/guacd:latest
build:
       context: ./guacamole-server
       dockerfile: Dockerfile

#image: guacamole/guacamole:latest
build:
       context: ./guacamole-client
       dockerfile: Dockerfile

docker compose build

both images was build succesful, but after:

docker compose up

the client-image didn't boot up...

guacd      | guacd[1]: INFO:    Guacamole proxy daemon (guacd) version 1.6.0 started guacd      | guacd[1]: DEBUG:   Successfully bound AF_INET socket to host 0.0.0.0, port 4822
guacd      | guacd[1]: INFO:    Listening on host 0.0.0.0, port 4822
*guacamole  | find: ‘/opt/local/lib’: No such file or directory
*guacamole exited with code 0

Do i need to customize something in the Dockerfile?

Thanks.

Best regards,

Tobias

Am 15.02.2025 um 08:51 schrieb Michael Jumper:
Well, I'm no longer able to reproduce the issues I was encountering before. Performance of all protocols seems to be excellent when using a build with:

* Current "staging/1.6.0" for guacamole-client
* The proposed fixes for guacamole-server: https://github.com/apache/ guacamole-server/pull/573

Using purely the above (no third-party images), is anyone still encountering issues? If so, what does your deployment look like in terms of resources and software?

If not, then we may well be good to go...

- Mike


Reply via email to