Hi all,

Months ago, had this been made known, I probably would have agreed with
you. I do not agree now.

The scope of the first release was brought up for discussion just after
migration to Apache infrastructure was completed (around the end of May)
[1]. Quoting that here for convenience:

>
> As everything has been migrated to Apache infrastructure, I think it's
time
> we open the discussion on overall release scope. It would be nice to get a
> release underway relatively soon, but that obviously depends on what is
> going in to said release, the status of those changes, as well final
> testing.
>
> I am currently working on finishing up audio input[1] and connection
> sharing links[2]. In my opinion, these changes should be part of the
> release once complete. Beyond those changes, I'm not working on anything
> else that would be worth delaying release to complete.
>
> Anyone else have any in-flight tasks that they believe absolutely must be
> completed before a release can be considered? Any opinions regarding
> overall scope?
>
> All issues which are known to be relevant to 0.9.10-incubating are in JIRA
> and tagged as such[3].
>

It may have been reasonable to pause development for a legally-focused
interim release back when the scope of 0.9.10-incubating was being
discussed, but development is just too far at this point.

For the sake of a sane, stable release, I think we need to complete the
in-flight changes.

Thanks,

- Mike

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-guacamole-dev/201605.mbox/%3C57447F67.1090701%40nanthrax.net%3E


On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I second Greg here. A first release to sort out and check license and
> other legal files would be great.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, 03:34, at 03:34, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >Hi folks:
> >
> >Just checking in with my mentor hat on… I signed off the incubator
> >report - everything looks to be progressing nicely.
> >
> >I just wanted to mention that the first Apache release is more about
> >sorting out the licensing and code provenance and working through the
> >Apache release process than it is about features.  So don’t feel that
> >you have to wait until the screen sharing features are complete before
> >you do your first release.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Greg Trasuk
>

Reply via email to