Sorry Mike. It was my mistake. now i got the process in email communication. Next time if i have questions i will send to [email protected] by addressing the community not individual.
Thanks, Vijay On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Mike Jumper <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 22, 2016 11:41, "Vijay Kumar Kamannavar" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello Mike, > > > > Adding to above email, > > > > i did bit more analysis and found that we have NoClassDefFound exception > > here. > > > > in *WebSocketSupportLoader.class*, trying to load > > *org.glyptodon.guacamole.net.basic.websocket.tomcat. > BasicGuacamoleWebSocketTunnelServlet > > *using findClass class method. Now in > > *org.glyptodon.guacamole.net.basic.websocket.tomcat. > BasicGuacamoleWebSocketTunnelServlet* > > class we have one *import org.apache.catalina.websocket.StreamInbound* > in > > which this class will be present in catalina.jar file of tomcat lib > > > > this class was present in catalina.jar file of tomcat 7 but in tomcat 8 > it > > is removed. I think in run time the class > > *org.apache.catalina.websocket.StreamInbound > > *not found which was there during compile time and hence we got > > NoClassDefFound exception. > > > > in tomcat7 documentation it is mentioned that ( > > https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/api/deprecated-list.html#class > ) > > > > org.apache.catalina.websocket.StreamInbound > > <https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/api/org/apache/ > catalina/websocket/StreamInbound.html> > > *Replaced by the JSR356 WebSocket 1.1 implementation and will be removed > in > > Tomcat 8.0.x.* > > > > > > Can you help us how to proceed in this case ? can i recompile the 0.9.2 > > class files using new jar files websocket1.1 ? if yes how much costly it > is > > to recompile the code ? where can i get the code of 0.9.2 client? > > > > Vijay, are you perhaps not subscribed to the list? > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator- > guacamole-dev/201610.mbox/<CALKeL-O2Hup_tGwNwEL7OUqSgW44yu%3DzF7%2Bd% > 2BE5%3DEjX-ZBH63w%40mail.gmail.com> > > I ask because your emails are hitting the moderation queue, and I believe > your additional questions above were addressed by the initial response (see > link). > > - Mike >
