Thanks for your answer!! I opened a ticket on the JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-209 Sorry for my mistake to send to the dev group on the thread of scope. I think 0.9.13 is a good start to work on this. The finalization of the versions is very quick now. Thanks a lot for your efforts. Fique com DEUS. Aude et Effice! -----Mensagem original----- De: Mike Jumper [mailto:[email protected]] Enviada em: terça-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2017 18:04 Para: [email protected] Assunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Scope of 0.9.12-incubating On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Thiago dos Santos Nunes < [email protected]> wrote: > I think connection associated to groups, not only to users. Assign > permissions to groups too. And permit users to administer a subset of > another users (change password, create users, kill active connections, > etc). Fine grained permissions, like users can create, but can´t > delete users, can´t create connections, can kill connections or not. > It will be very, very, good. > > And a translatation to portuguese brazilian too. > > These are reasonable feature requests, so please feel free to open corresponding feature requests in JIRA or comment on existing issues, but to clarify: This thread isn't a general brainstorm for future development. Development for 0.9.12 has actually been underway since the scope of 0.9.11 was finalized, and there's a good amount of changes already committed. Overall, the idea is to discuss whether: 1) There are any objections to finalizing the scope of the release. 2) Whether any known issues qualify as blocking bugs/regressions, and thus should be included in scope even though it affects the content and timing of the release. The priority for scoping a release is to minimize testing surface and thus help ensure the release is stable and predictable. Unless there are objections to beginning the release process as a whole, it's unlikely that huge new features (like support for groups) will be included in scope. That said, this does not stop development from beginning on such things. If you can help with translation, for example, please do - those changes will just go to "master" instead of "staging/0.9.12-incubating". I do like the idea of adding support for groups. I would be against delaying 0.9.12 and all its fixes so that it such support can be included, however. Thanks, - Mike
