Hi Everyone,

  I need a help from you for testing and debugging my new plugin
implementation with guacamole. I was able to build my new plugin for x11
with guacamole and the libraries are generated in usr/lib folder.I have
enabled the sys log and I'm running the guacd in debug mode.The error I'm
getting is the plugin is not loaded to the guacamole and it is coming from
guacamole before hitting any of my code. I have checked the authentication
part by replacing the vnc libraries and it looks good. Could you please
help me to make progress on this. I am completely stopped at this error.

Regards,
Robin

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Mike Jumper <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Robin James <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike and All,
>>
>>   Thank you very much for adding me to the group.
>>   I understand that Guacamole is free and open source project. My aim is
>> to add X11 protocol support to guacamole so that x11 systems can be
>> connected. I wrote a plugin and tried configuring with guacamole, but I'm
>> facing errors like plugin is not loaded/recognised.
>>
>> Any sample code or example for x11 plugin would help me a lot to
>> progress. I just need to establish the connectivity between x11 server and
>> client through guacamole.
>> So any help appreciated.
>>
>>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Please see the responses to your original thread here, which I believe
> address your questions:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/745c60234f20c4afface21edd88201
> a53387fbcce186947b83209795@%3Cdev.guacamole.apache.org%3E
>
> The X11 protocol doesn't work in the same way as VNC, RDP, etc. with
> respect to the concept of a server and client, and I don't think you can
> use the same approach here. While VNC or RDP provide clients with a view of
> the display, X11 does not do this. X11 clients are the applications
> rendering to the display, with the display itself not really being part of
> the protocol, but rather an integral component of the server. We already
> have an effort underway for adding the functional equivalent of X11
> support, but it has taken the form of a display and input driver for the
> X.Org X11 server (see thread linked above).
>
> - Mike
>
>

Reply via email to