> Hello all,
> > I'd like to begin the discussion of scope for the 0.9.13-incubating
> release. Issues currently tagged for 0.9.13 can be found here:
> >
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Guacamole%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.13-incubating>>
> There are quite a few changes already complete, including the
> recently-merged support for CAS (can anyone confirm to what degree this has
> already been tested?).
I actively use it, but I'm guessing having someone other than the author test
it is more ideal for this :-).
> I still have to write some documentation for GUACAMOLE-292 (user profile
> support). Other than that, only the following two issues are open but
> tagged for 0.9.13:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-168 (support for X.Org)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-197 (support for RADIUS)
>> This brings the questions:
> > 1) Should we wait for the X.Org code to be documented and merged before
> 0.9.13?
> 2) Should we wait for the RADIUS support (which Nick has completed) to be
> reviewed and merged before 0.9.13?
I personally have no issue with releasing before this is reviewed and merged -
obviously I think it's better to get it into the release sooner, but I don't
know that it's worth holding up a release for it.
> 3) Are there other changes not tagged for 0.9.13 which are important enough
> to warrant expanding scope?
>> The main things holding back my progress on #1 and #2 above are finding the
> time to document the X.Org code and to re-review and test the RADIUS code.
> Regardless of how slowly/quickly those can be done, we need to weigh the
> benefit of having those changes against the additional testing surface and
> delay in releasing the other completed changes. I would lean more on the
> size of reducing scope, but both of these changes have already been delayed
> at least once.
>> Thoughts?
Overall I'd say there are enough changes tagged, even without X.org and RADIUS
code, to warrant a release. The X.org code is, by itself, probably big enough
to warrant a release, so we could go ahead and do 0.9.13, now, with an eye
toward turning 0.9.14 around quickly to include X.org, RADIUS, and a few other
things that are pending. There are some more LDAP changes that could probably
make it in, too.
-Nick
