I concur; +1
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM, James Muehlner <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it sounds reasonable to go ahead with the release. > > +1 > > James > > > On Jul 23, 2017 08:58, "Mike Jumper" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Kaushik. > > Fellow PPMC - any input/votes? So far we only have +1 from myself and from > Nick. > > - Mike > > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Kaushik Srinivasan > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I personally would like the release to go ahead and an issue for this to > be >> opened in Jira as its verified to work on your side and has issues in my >> instance ( which involves docker, arm architecture and other such factors) >> >> I'm going to test this further during this weekend and get back with more >> information. >> >> Regards >> Kaushik Srinivasan >> >> On 22 Jul 2017 2:02 p.m., "Mike Jumper" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As it's now been ~2 weeks since this vote started, with no solid >>> progress one way or the other in verifying the existence/severity of >>> the issue with the new CAS auth. Regardless of whether that issue >>> should be release-blocking, that's effectively what it's become. >>> >>> Does anyone feel strongly that the release should not proceed without >>> further verification of CAS? If so, let's get an actual -1, I'll >>> cancel the vote, and we'll refocus on identifying and resolving that >>> issue. If not, let's open an issue in JIRA to track this and not let >>> it block the release itself, which is greater in scope than simply CAS >>> auth. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - Mike >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Kaushik Srinivasan >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi Mike, >>> > >>> > I haven't had the time yet to test it. I'll be working on it this > weekend >>> > and will be able to confirm it by Monday. >>> > >>> > (Sorry abt the delay) >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > Kaushik Srinivasan >>> > >>> > On 14 Jul 2017 11:53 a.m., "Mike Jumper" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Kaushik Srinivasan >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> That clearly explains the problem. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks Mike. >>> >> >>> > >>> > If you switch to a build of RC1 of 0.9.13-incubating, does CAS work as >>> > expected? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > - Mike >>>
