Oh, You're right. I should have to re-test w/o msg compression. Sent from my iPhone
On 2012. 7. 27., at 오후 1:56, Thomas Jungblut <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Edward. > > To be honest, most of it comes from compressing the messages. > Randbench in this case sends a 16 byte array, with the length of the array > it is 20 bytes. > So I bet that compression is compressing it to 1-2 bytes for each sync and > peer, in this case the benchmark is more ridiculous than an improvement. > But it shows that we have too much overhead in sync and the message > exchange. > > Do you have a less synthetic workload? > > 2012/7/27 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> I'm testing Hama 0.5 now, it seems almost 3x faster than previous version. >> :-) >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks#Compare_with_old_version >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >>
